SASSA SRD Grant Increase Slammed By Activists. The recent announcement of a R20 increase to the SASSA SRD grant, set to be implemented on 1st April 2024, has sparked considerable controversy and criticism from activist groups. This article delves into the reactions, concerns, and implications surrounding this decision.
Questionable Timing and Motives
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announcement of the R20 increase has raised eyebrows among activist circles. The timing, just ahead of the 2024 General Elections, has led to speculation regarding the motives behind the move.
The Bureau for Economic Research (BER) has questioned why such an announcement was made so late in the National Assembly proceedings, especially considering the significance of February’s budget speech.
Inadequate Adjustment For Inflation
Critics argue that the R20 increase falls short of addressing the pressing issue of inflation. Given that the SASSA SRD grant has remained stagnant for the past four years, many expected a more substantial adjustment.
The BER suggests that the increase should have been at least R80 per person per month to adequately account for inflation. Despite the modest increase, it is projected to cost the country approximately R2.2 billion in the current financial year.
Contradictory Spending Patterns
The decision to increase the SASSA SRD grant comes at a time when spending on social welfare is purportedly decreasing, as outlined in the budget speech. This raises concerns about the government’s commitment to addressing poverty and inequality. Despite assurances of enhanced basic income grants, the reality of budget constraints and mounting debt poses significant challenges.
Discontent Amongst Activist Groups
The Universal Basic Income Coalition, comprising various entities, has expressed dissatisfaction with the R20 increase. Describing it as “empty political opportunism,” the coalition emphasizes the persistent food insecurity faced by millions, which the nominal increase fails to alleviate.
Moreover, deliberate exclusions in grant disbursements have further exacerbated the situation, with only a fraction of eligible applicants receiving support.
Insufficient Coverage and Contrary Implications
Even with the R20 increase, the SASSA SRD grant remains insufficient to cover basic living expenses, including minimum energy intake. This contradicts the Finance Minister’s acknowledgment of the rising cost of living and highlights the disconnect between political promises and practical outcomes.
Conclusion
The R20 increase to the SASSA SRD grant has ignited widespread criticism and discontent among activist groups, who perceive it as a superficial attempt to address deep-rooted socioeconomic challenges. As the debate ensues, it is imperative for policymakers to heed the concerns raised and prioritize sustainable solutions to alleviate poverty and inequality in South Africa.
